12 Top LiteSpeed Hosting Providers In 2024

Looking for a reliable LiteSpeed hosting provider? This post shares some of the best WordPress LiteSpeed hosts based on reviews from real users.
Share With Friends

LiteSpeed hosting offers multiple benefits over average web hosting, and CPU usage is more efficient. Even paid cache plugins can’t beat LiteSpeed Cache at optimizing CORE WEB VITALS.

It has more features than others and functions better than other web hosting setups; that’s why it’s famous.

The performance of WordPress HTTP/2 by server (LiteSpeed, Nginx, Apache)
HTTP/2 performance chart for WordPress

LiteSpeed Hosting: Why Should You Use It?

  • Accurate Performance: Without a doubt, LiteSpeed is one of the fastest web servers and can handle high traffic without any problems. Unlike traditional web servers like Apache, it can serve pages faster.
  • Caching System: LiteSpeed has a built-in cache system (LiteSpeed Cache). With over 5 million users, it is one of the best WordPress cache plugins. Free and can speed up web page loading by serving cached content.
  • Improved Security: LS contains features like mod-security, blocking bad IPs, connection throttling, and Anti-DDOS. And with LiteSpeed Anti-DDoS (LSAD), which protects your website from various online threats.
  • Minimum Resource Usage: LSS server is optimized for resource efficiency, which means it can handle more requests with fewer resources. Even tiny VPSs can take advantage of this capability and save money.
  • HTTP/3+QUIC Support: Use LiteSpeed with the HTTP/3 and QUIC protocols. Improve your website’s performance and security because they are modern and can decrease latency.
  • Compatibility: LiteSpeed works with web hosting platforms, CMSs like WordPress, htaccess, and modern web development tools. LiteSpeed makes it easy to migrate your old website or app.
  • Scalability: Scaling is easy with LiteSpeed, and you can run a small blog or a big e-commerce site with high traffic demands.
  • Server-Side Optimization: I like this; most LS hosting comes with server-level optimizations, Like HTTP/3, Brotli, server caching, asset minification, and image optimization, which can boost site speed and performance.
  • QUIC.cloud: A genuine HTTP/3 CDN service that all LiteSpeed users can use to cache HTML content and improve TTFB worldwide.

I didn’t want to write this article because I thought “best” meant spammy. Nowadays, affiliate commissions determine content value. That’s why I tried to write this article differently. As a user of these web hosts, I’m not afraid to share my negative experiences. I’ll go over all the pros and cons.

LiteSpeed contains some downsides, like customization limits, not every provider complying with them, incompatibility, etc.

But you’ll be all right with most LiteSpeed hosting; users can get faster speeds and promising CPU efficiency. Many quality WordPress LS hosting providers aren’t all popular.

I’d choose a LiteSpeed host with NVMe storage and enough CPU and RAM, so I tagged some higher than others, with upsides and downsides.

Top LiteSpeed (WordPress) Hosting Providers

1. HostArmada

HostArmada LiteSpeed Hosting Company Logo

I’ve been using HostArmada for the past few years, and they’ve been fine. My first impression was that I wouldn’t say I liked the service. But after a few months, I didn’t experience any downtime or disruption. They lack modern technology, but static (CACHEABLE) websites will be OK with the speed.

HostArmada offers faster performance than big names like SiteGround. The speed is way more rapid than that of typical crap hosting companies like GoDaddy, A2, Kinsta, Bluehost, HostGator, and others.

HostArmada uses cloud hosts, including Linode. And shared hosting, which will provide some good features. You’ll find all the usual things in cPanel.

HostArmada’s price is lower than aggressively marketed hosts. Although this company is only about three or four years old, its reasonable prices and features have made it grow fast.

Provides multiple hosting options: shared, reseller, VPS, and dedicated. But Speed Reaper is the only plan that offers LiteSpeed. Let’s look at the HostArmada Speed Reaper package:

HostArmada’s WordPress Speed Reaper plan is the only one that includes the LiteSpeed stack. Other hosting services run on Ngnix with Apache.

This package is ideal for medium sites with even 100K monthly traffic. It has features like H/3, server cache, object cache, 40GB SSD, 6 cores, and 6GB RAM (shared); other features include free migrations, private NS, daily backup, etc.

LiteSpeed Hosting With HostArmada Speed Reaper Features
Specifications of Speed Reaper

HostArmada’s marketing and pricing strategies are the same as most others. It’s affordable for long-term contracts with high renewal prices but more reasonable than others.

HostArmada LiteSpeed Speed Reaper Package price

HostArmada offers four types of billing cycles:

  1. Triennially (3Y): $4.94/month
  2. Biennially (2Y): $5.21/month
  3. Annually, $5.49/month
  4. Monthly: $23.05/month (Hahaha!)

Prices can change at any time. I’ve seen this cheaper during special promotion days; there’s a trap. You have to get a long-term contract to get discount prices. But there’s also a 45-day money-back guarantee.

I see a lot of pros for HostArmada, but what about the cons?

HostArmada’s Cons:

  • SSD: still use SSDs, and most of their competitors already use NVME. It isn’t a problem for static sites, but NVME can help dynamic websites.
  • No Redis: Memcached is Speed Reaper’s object cache. I’d use Redis.
  • Long-term dilemma: HostArmada offers long-term discounts, like most shared hosting providers. Renewals can be more expensive.

Is HostArmada a reliable LiteSpeed web host?

With enough server resources, HostArmada is this list’s most affordable LiteSpeed hosting provider. Compared to what you usually pay for a service, the cost is low with good features.

Almost every hosting provider has pros and cons, and HostArmada is no exception. Reasonable prices, good performance, good service, and helpful support make them worth a try. 

2. MechanicWeb

MechanicWeb web Hosting Company Logo

You might not have heard of “MechanicWeb.” The company needs a better-looking, more attractive website because its current design is unattractive. However, when it comes to hosting, this one offers a vast array of features based on LiteSpeed.

Due to their lack of bold marketing and significant affiliate commissions, they’re not as famous as other crap web hosts. Hence, you won’t be able to find MechanicWeb in most hosting recommendation articles.

MechanicWeb hosting utilizes NVMe v.4 (faster than regular SSDs or HDDs) and has 12 data centers in five countries.

Users can get everything from shared hosting to bare metals. Users still get high-speed CPUs, DDR5 RAM, and NVMe storage with shared hosting, which is good compared to other web hosts.

MechanicWeb LiteSpeed hosting features
LiteSpeed hosting features

They have shared hosting packages that offer 2 GB+ of RAM, cPanel, IPv6, and 500k inodes (still costing under $5/mo). That’s enough for most websites.

This is way better than SG, A2, GreenGeeks, and other crap hosts. Compared to other providers, I prefer the pure version plans, which have no long-term agreements and offer transparent and exact prices without upfront payment.

With MechanicWeb, you can get VPS or dedicated servers, even semi-dedicated LiteSpeed hosting. (high-frequency computing with NVMe).

There aren’t many things I don’t like about them. They only need an attractive website and a little marketing to attract customers.


You can host any kind of website with MechanicWeb. The performance is good, and they’re not expensive. They’re top in multiple benchmark tests. If you’re looking for a mature solution, I recommend MechanicWeb.

If you use crypto ad networks or other ad networks, you should use a hosting service with a good score. MechanicWeb LS hosting is an acceptable option.

3. Guru

GUIRU cloud hosting Logo

GURU is a cloud host based in the UK that uses LiteSpeed technology. Compared to the average web host, it has several benefits and doesn’t do aggressive marketing.

Guru’s primary data center in London is a notable option for EU customers. Their WordPress hosting is better than Hostinger, A2, WPX, etc.

Due to fast resources, LiteSpeed, off-site backups, etc., may be more expensive than others. Even their entry-level shared plan comes with 100GB NVMe. This is great if anyone needs more disk space for their website.

With Guru Hosting, you can choose from a variety of hosting plans. In this article, I’m just referring to GURU WordPress LiteSpeed Hosting.

There are two plans: Shared and Shared Boost.

You can also get Shared Cloud Hosting Pro, which is pricey but suitable for big websites. The shared boost plan is a good option if your site gets less than 100K monthly visitors.

You can get 100GB NVMe, 2TB bandwidth, 2GB RAM, backups, etc., for $17/M. It includes unlimited sites, free migration, etc.

GURU Shared BOOST Hosting Plan Details

They have LiteSpeed on all their hosting packages, no matter what type of hosting you pick, whether it’s shared, VPS, reseller, or dedicated.

Is GURU A Suitable LiteSpeed Host?

Yes, Guru offers LiteSpeed Power full-management hosting. I like how fast everything loads as well. I don’t think Guru is incredible, but I usually like them. However, the price is a little higher. I wouldn’t recommend Guru to everyone.

This is an ideal option for EU customers or traffic originating in the EU or UK. Suitable for those looking for reliable server resources and support.

4. ChemiCloud

ChemiCloud Hosting Company Logo

ChemiCloud is not a favorite of mine, but they usually get positive user feedback and maintain fine Trustpilot profiles. Compared to most other hosting plans, the ChemiCloud WP Turbo plan has multiple cool features.

However, you must commit for at least one year; if not, it could be $20 or more monthly. Like most web hosts, you’ll get a better discount if you sign up for a long-term contract; otherwise, they can get expensive.

LiteSpeed WordPress Hosting with ChemiCloud

ChemiCloud has 3 WordPress hosting plans:

  1. Starter
  2. Pro
  3. Turbo

It’s good that ChemiCloud WordPress Hosting uses LiteSpeed for all plans. I’d recommend the Turbo plan because it comes with extra features like HTTP/3, Redis, and malware scanner and can handle 100K monthly visits.

ChemiCloud Turbo hosting plan features
Turbo hosting plan features

Why should you use ChemiCloud Turbo?

  • You can host as many sites as you want
  • Every plan gets a LiteSpeed server
  • Disk space: 40 GB NVMe
  • Sufficient for 100K Monthly visits
  • Free domain if you sign up for a long time
  • Transfer your website for free
  • RAM 3GB, 3 Cores
  • Multiple data centers (has 11 data centers).
  • Many modern features include Redis, MariaDB, the latest PHP, etc.

There are a few things I don’t like about ChemiCloud:

  • ChemiCloud’s dashboard is super slow (tabs take a while to load)
  • They’re not as fast as some blogs state
  • Limited resources: you may reach your limits once you get big
  • Not good for WooCommerce and dynamic websites.

I recommend the Turbo WP plan to anyone interested in ChemiCloud. I don’t recommend it for large websites, but it’s ideal for blogs and average sites with less than 100k traffic. They use cPanel, but their hosting dashboard isn’t great.

ChemiCloud uses Akamai (Linode) cloud servers, which are AMD Epyc and better than average. And support seems familiar based on user reviews.

5. ScalaHosting

ScalaHosting Company Logo

ScalaHosting is a good web host that started in 2007 and is growing fast now. They’re great for VPS and appear to run like a set web hosting company, offering a blend of shared hosting, VPS and dedicated packages.

If you want more power for your LiteSpeed hosting, Scala has more managed VPS hosting plans, even for high-traffic sites.

The Build #4 plan offers 12 cores and 24 GB RAM for less than $200 per month. Configure RAM, CPUs, and storage on custom VPSs with visits per month.


SPanel is their own hosting control panel, a short version of Scala Panel. Compared to Cpanel, SPanel might lack some features.

Still, it has many more features, like malware protection, staging, API access, spam protection, branding, Joomla Manager, LiteSpeed/OpenLiteSpeed, and Nginx.

ScalaHosting SPanel UI

It’s speedy, and the main benefit is no license fee. In the long term, it will save you money. You can also use SPanel with a cloud host like Vultr.

LiteSpeed Web Hosting with ScalaHosting

I find Scala’s managed VPS hosting quite interesting because they use OpenLiteSpeed. I like the Entry Cloud WordPress hosting plan.

I wouldn’t recommend their shared or standard WordPress hosting plans. Still, Entry WP Cloud and other VPS are excellent for small, medium, and large sites with LiteSpeed. Get two dedicated CPU cores with 2GB RAM and a 50GB upgradeable NVMe SSD in the Entry Cloud plan.

ScalaHosting Entry WP Cloud features

So, how much will it cost?

Entry Cloud has three pricing plans: one month, one year, and three years.

I think the 36-month option is the cheapest because it costs $15 monthly.

If you choose a 1-year plan, the monthly cost can reach nearly $20, while a 1-month plan can cost $30. It’s a costly option. The 1-month plan is acceptable for testing, but the 36-month program is better for the long term.

Here are some of the Entry WP Cloud features:

  • LiteSpeed: This is why I included Scala in this list. Scala all VPS support LiteSpeed/OpenLiteSpeed and can use LSC cache plugins for all CMSs, including WordPress, Joomla, Drupal, etc.
  • Unlimited sites: There’s no limit to how many websites you can host
  • Unlimited email: There is no limit on email boxes for your domains
  • Free Domain: Like most other web hosts, Scala offers a free domain for signups for one year or longer.
  • Dedicated IP: Yes, this plan includes a dedicated IP address.
  • Flexible Storage: When you run out of space, just expand your server storage. Also, you can increase RAM and CPU.
  • Solid Server Resources: It is almost a VPS, so you have ensured server resources for your website. More reliable than shared hosting.
  • White-label: it is fair for the price. The name SCALA won’t show up in the control panel. It is useful if you have an agency or work as a freelancer.

It’s got a lot more features than that. I don’t think it’s necessary to list them all here. Entry WP plan is enough for websites with up to 100k page views.

It has enough RAM and CPU power to handle some peak traffic and comes with an NVMe disk, which is faster than a standard SSD.

Your website’s load speed depends mainly on its hosting, themes, and plugins. Make sure you pick a web host with enough server power.

When you use WordPress LiteSpeed web hosts, you don’t just have to use the LSC plugin; you can also use others like FlyingPress.

Scala is a good choice if you want LiteSpeed WordPress hosting with customization. And you can use any CMS or PHP framework that you want.

They aren’t ideal for small sites that only need a few server resources because they can be pricey. Scala is the perfect solution for users who need more flexibility and prefer VPS over SHARED HOSTING.

6. FastComet

FastComet WordPress LiteSpeed Hosting

FastComet is another famous hosting firm that receives good user reviews for support services. Has a high rating on Trustpilot and is known for its low prices. FastComet WordPress hosting has enough RAM and CPU capacity. 

They offer discount prices for any term, so it doesn’t matter if you sign up for 1 month or 3 years; you’ll save the same. FastComet has 10 data centers globally, covering most regions, and the cPanel is their hosting control panel.

FastComet LiteSpeed WordPress Hosting

Offer 3 types of WordPress hosting:

  1. FastCloud Basic
  2. FastCloud Plus
  3. FastCloud Extra

FastCloud Extra is the only plan that supports LiteSpeed. For the first year, this plan costs less than $55.

This is a good choice; you get 4 cores and 4GB RAM (shared), and the good point is that it is built with LiteSpeed Enterprise. It’s enough to handle less than 100K hits monthly and comes with a 40GB NVMe.

Features of FastComet FastCloud Extra LiteSpeed plan
FastComet FastCloud Extra

Despite its pros, FastComet hosting has some downsides:

  • They’re still using MySQL instead of MariaDB
  • I wouldn’t recommend FastComet for VPS
  • Instead of Redis, they use Memcached
  • LiteSpeed isn’t on all plans: Only available on FastCloud Extra.

Suppose you are looking for a reliable host to host your average websites, like blogs and business websites. In that case, FastComet is still a good choice.

But it’s not the finest choice for e-commerce and dynamic sites. They have VPS and dedicated servers, but the service might not be as good. Although FastComet LiteSpeed hosting is an acceptable choice for WordPress sites.

7. NameHero

NameHero WordPress LiteSpeed Hosting Company Logo

Try NameHero web hosting, a LiteSpeed host based in the US. But it’s really expensive, and there is a trap because you must buy a 3-year plan for a suitable price.

So, if you want to try them, it is fine; they are a solid brand. However, NameHero is expensive compared to other providers and doesn’t have multiple data centers. NH needs to understand how competitor prices and promotions work.

NameHero LiteSpeed hosting Pricing Structure

NameHero has good uptime, nice features, and solid support. Despite that, it’s still more expensive than HostArmada, FastComet, ChemiCloud, etc.

NameHero offers four types of LiteSpeed hosting:

  1. Starter WordPress: I recommend this one for beginners or websites with less than 10K visitors a month. It’s still expensive, even with 1 GB of RAM. It comes with 1 GB shared RAM and 250k NVMe inodes.
  2. Plus WordPress: You can get 2 GB of shared RAM, which is enough for websites with less than 25K monthly visitors. You can host 7 websites.
  3. Turbo WordPress: NameHero’s most popular WordPress hosting plan. There is no limitation to the number of applications you can host. And you have 3 GB RAM, sufficient for 50K monthly visits.
  4. Business WordPress: This is a pricey option. For that, I think you can get a better VPS. There’s 4 GB RAM and enough for 100k visits.

I don’t want to list their prices because they change so often. I also don’t like that they hide their pricing structure. The process isn’t transparent, and NVMe is only available in the US data center.

NameHero uses Litespeed Enterprises, which has some advantages over OpenLS. You’ll also get a free domain with all long-term plans. Their hosting is better than Hostinger, GoDaddy, Namecheap, A2, etc.

I think NameHero has two big cons. The first is the lack of multiple data centers, and the second is the confusing and crazy price tags.

8. Krystal Hosting

Krystal Hosting Company Logo

Krystal is a UK-based hosting provider with excellent customer support and a high Trustpilot rating. It isn’t cheap, but it doesn’t offer long-term gimmicks.

Krystal hides VAT prices with a clever trick; you must tap to get the actual prices. But I think there are better alternatives.

Krystal hosting prices with and without VAT
Krystal hosting prices with and without VAT

Krystal Hosting is found in the U.K. and also has a data center in the U.S. Therefore, it’s ideal for people in Europe and the U.S.

In addition to average WordPress hosting, Krystal offers VPS, fully managed, enterprise, and dedicated hosting options based on LITESPEED and NVMe.

I think Krystal Emerald’s hosting plan is decent for the price.

Krystal Emerald's LITESPEED hosting features
  • You can get unlimited NVMe storage, 6GB RAM, and 3 cores.
  • It’s almost $30/M, or you can get 2 months free if you pick a year plan.
  • It comes with extras like emergency support, 4-hour backups, PCI DSS scan, extra resources, etc.
  • There’s a 60-day money-back guarantee.

If you have a high-traffic site, you can pick a plan like Diamond from Krystal. It’s equipped with high-performance features like six cores and 12 GB RAM.

Yes, Krystal Hosting is a good option if your web traffic is based in Europe or the US. Or, pick something cheap or go for something robust at a higher price.

They’re famous for their quick support. But I am uncomfortable with Krystal’s hosting expenses; prices with hidden VAT need to be more transparent. I can get a cloud VPS like Vultr with more server resources at a lower cost.

9. A2 Hosting

A2 Hosting Logo

I don’t prefer A2 web hosting because I can find a more robust provider than A2 that performs better. If you want LiteSpeed on A2 Hosting, you must get their “Turbo Boost or Turbo Max” packages.

A2 has four data centers: Michigan, Arizona, Amsterdam, and Singapore. Apparently, A2 has a lot of outages, which isn’t great. The other problem is renewal rates are nearly 3/4 times higher than the discount price.

The discount is likely to be available if you sign up one to three years in advance. I don’t see the point in paying for shared hosting for three years.

LiteSpeed servers run on A2’s higher plans, while Apache runs on lower shared plans. I’ll only point out the A2 Turbo Boost or Max plans.

A2 Turbo Boost and Max plans Prices

Pros & Cons


  • A2 includes Redis, Memcached, NVMe, and LiteSpeed
  • Unlimited Emails/Sites
  • Updated server-side software
  • A lot of developer tools
  • Cloud backup for free
  • Enough RAM and cores (but not as much as competitors)


  • Uptime isn’t good
  • Comparatively expensive
  • You need to sign up for a long-term plan to get the best deals
  • Trustpilot reviews show support and migration aren’t very good
  • LiteSpeed doesn’t support all hosting plans

It’s okay to use A2 Hosting, but HostArmada, MechanicWeb, FastComet, etc., are cheaper even with their higher plans. Even if you elect their Turbo Max plan for 12 months, it’ll cost you $13/month.

So, if you wish to choose the A2 Turbo Max package, I think the wise decision is to pick the ScalaHosting Entry Cloud plan over the A2. You’ll get dedicated resources with modern features, plus more customization options.

10. GreenGeeks

GreenGeeks Logo

Aside from LiteSpeed, GreenGeeks has average performance. Yes, there are many negative reviews about cancellations and overcharges. I’ve seen people complain that it’s impossible to cancel GreenGeek services.

GreenGeeks has data centers in Chicago, Montreal, Amsterdam, and Singapore. Performance-wise, they’re better than A2, Hostinger, etc.

But, like many providers, it’s a long-term deal. GreenGeeks is a good option, but I like HostArmada better because it’s a cheaper option.

GreenGeeks offers 3 different WordPress hosting plans:

  1. Lite: It’s ideal for testing or starting from scratch.
  2. Pro: Good for average websites under 25K monthly traffic. You can also host multiple small websites.
  3. Premium: This is good for sites with less than 50K visitors. You get Redis, a dedicated IP, a free domain, unlimited websites, etc.
GreenGeeks Premium hosting features

The cons seem to outweigh the pros, so let’s look.

Pros & Cons:


  • Utilize LiteSpeed and LS Cache
  • WordPress-optimized
  • With a premium hosting plan, you get AlphaSSL.
  • Get a free domain AND Migration is free
  • Premium plans come with a free dedicated IP
  • Object Cache (Memcached and Redis) with Premium


  • It’s not a monthly thing. It’s a one-year deal. (a trap)
  • No one knows what RAM, CPU, storage, and technology are on servers.
  • Advanced features are only available with the premium hosting plan.
  • There’s a lot of criticism about their pricing and refunds. Your credit card will be charged even if you don’t renew.

They have an excellent mission of planting trees, but there’s more negativity than positivity on GreenGeeks.

Taking risks isn’t necessary because there are many better options. GreenGeeks isn’t for dynamic or high-traffic websites, but you can try it.

11. Hostinger

Hostinger Company Logo

Hostinger’s popularity is primarily attributed to unreliable affiliates and marketing strategies. It’s utterly worthless once you check out its features, just like Bluehost. Don’t trust Hostinger’s affiliates or the false ratings.

There’s a lot of downtime and decreased availability on Hostinger’s network status page, so you can’t expect 99.9% uptime.

Hostinger uses LiteSpeed servers and Cache, but resource- and service-wise, they’re poor. You can see that considerable popular blogs and affiliate-based websites rank Hostinger as one of the best hosting companies on the web.

But the reality is that their service is unreliable/scammy. That’s why I’m not writing anymore about Hostinger. Learn more about Hostinger by reading this review.

12. WPX

WPX hosting company logo

WPX is a total crap WordPress hosting company; that’s all I can say. You can get faster speed somewhere else for just $5 besides WPX. It isn’t a good choice if your target audience is Asia because they don’t have Asian data centers.

If you’re going to use WPX, you should go with a faster host like Rocket.net because they’re 1000 times faster than WPX. The only plus is that they use LiteSpeed servers, but I don’t like any other features or statuses.

In addition, they suffer from outages and are irresponsible states. That is why I recommend that you check out other companies. WPX Professional hosting plan costs almost $50 a month. For that price, you can get a VULTR high-frequency server with 8 GB of RAM and 3 cores.

Problems with WPX WordPress hosting:

  • Can’t use Memcached or Redis
  • Lack of downtime monitoring
  • Only three data centers
  • Pricing trick for a year
  • Old technology and shared hardware
  • Limits on PHP Workers: This is not an ideal solution for sites with high traffic or heavy loads.
  • Costly: With that price, you can get good hosting somewhere else.
Problems with WPX LiteSpeed WordPress hosting
Limited server resources

In a nutshell, WPX is basically a shared hosting platform like many other crap ones with three data centers. It’s like Bluehost but with more expensive price tags and no modern features.

It’s never a good idea to use WPX. Many popular blogs recommend it as an ideal WordPress hosting service for affiliates. Just be yourself; don’t be a marketing ploy.

Sum It Up

There are many companies in the world of web hosting that provide WordPress hosting, but not every company offers LiteSpeed web hosting.

Here are my top recommendations for LiteSpeed web hosting:

  • With a cloud host: This is the most suitable way to use LiteSpeed web hosting. AWS, Google Cloud, DigitalOcean, Linode, and Vultr all support LiteSpeed. It’s easy for a techie. But I recommend control panels like RunCloud, SpinupWP, etc., for average users.
  • ScalaHosting: SPanel and Scala are suitable for VPSs, a solid way to host with LS of severe creators.
  • MechanicWeb: offers reliable performance and a wide range of options.
  • Guru/Krystal: two popular Europe-based hosting companies have LiteSpeed set up for all their hosting plans.
  • HostArmada/FastComet: Same vibe, but only the higher plans include LiteSpeed. Solid for static websites.
  • ChemiCloud/NameHero/A2: They use modern technologies like NVMe, Redis, and other caching layers. Kinda expensive. It is my opinion that ChemiCloud is the best of the three.

A quality CDN, like FlyingCDN, is a good addition to any hosting provider.

The LiteSpeed web server was released before Nginx and is even faster than Nginx, so it should be very popular. In comparison to Nginx, it was paid. In the past few years, LiteSpeed has released (OpenLiteSpeed), a free, open-source version.

Later on, LiteSpeed became popular, and it’s growing fast. Despite that, Nginx still dominates web servers, and most hosting services run on it.

If you’re interested, try LiteSpeed hosting. You’ve probably noticed that many old and new hosting companies have considered this approach.

Read: 5 Techniques To Copy Text From Protected Websites

Madushan Bandara
Madushan Bandara

I'm Madushan, a WordPress developer, and it has been over a decade since I became an online entrepreneur. On this website, I write about WordPress, web hosting, web tools, and digital marketing: Get to Know Me

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *